Product Design

Obama is a Socialist Bumper Sticker by Libertymaniacs

Obama is a socialist bumper sticker. On red.

<img src="http://www.libertymaniacs.com/images/zazzlestoreimages/productpage_bumperstickers.png" alt="See Our Bumper Stickers" width="324" height="492" border="0" />

make sure your text does not overlap the safety region (shown in red)

Loading High Resolution...

DISPLAYNAME

Customize it!

No minimum orders • No setup fees • Ships tomorrow*!

See all your likes | Unlike

Improve your shopping experience by telling us what you like! (learn more)

Share this with your friends!

Email this

Link...

Created By Libertymaniacs:

Store | Profile | Contact

Bumper Sticker

Make your car a reflection of you! Get your point across with this quality bumper sticker that will outlast heavy rain, intense sunlight, and the most severe of traffic jams.

11" x 3" – Large enough for any message.
Made from durable vinyl with a strong adhesive back.
Printed with water-resistant ink that won’t fade or run.
No minimum order.

Obama is a Socialist Bumper Sticker

Obamunism

Obama is a socialist bumper sticker. On red.

Product id: 128570337403278518
Made on 10/1/2008 12:16 AM

Rated G

Report violation

Bumper Sticker Volume Discounts

Comment Wall

(Add a comment | Manage comments )

Prev 1 … [1] … 1 Next

Displaying 1 - 14 of 14

adiane6290 said 12/19/2011 about

do YOU know what a socialist is?

Obama is a Socialist n the purest sense, his comment "we need to spread the wealth" says it all. If someone truly doesn't mind working half the year for the federal government, then fine, vote away. Personally, i find it offensive and degrading that there is this paternalistic, no exoerience, extreme leftist telling me he knows how to handle my money better than I do. If his plans come to fruition we will slide from recession to depression. Productive members of society like myself will not feel the need to be so productive (i.e. why the hell would I try for a promotion when it would put me in a tax bracket of over 50 percent?) That the man with 4 children in private school earning 250k a year by Obama's standards is "wealthy" is INSANE. It is megolomaniacal for him to think he can make a form of government (that being SOCIALIST) succeed when no one in history has. You can paint the rhetoric pretty but let's call a spade a spade, when someone wants to "spread the wealth" i.e. have me work and give my money to those who didn't earn it, he/she IS a socialist

cracker1 said 12/19/2011 about

There is little differences in the basic tenets of liberalism, socialism and communism; big government, strict oppressive regulation and the redistribution of wealth with the confiscation of private property. It's that simple. Paying for infrastructure with publicly received funds (taxes) is NOT socialism.

visavismeyou said 2/8/2010 about

Wrong again

This is why I made my Palin Tees; because of people like you who misuse terminology in an authoritative manner. "Not even close" is not a precise measure of how much one is or is not a socialist. If I said that Obama was the opposite of a socialist then your comment would have been accurate, however, I did not. One could be a centrist and be, "Not even close" to being a socialist. I never said he was a laissez-faire capitalist... Reading comprehension failure on your part. Oh and those things you're accusing Obama of? Yea, they were in progress before he took office... Is he liberal? yes, but he is far from a socialist in any stretch of any definition of the word. No socialist would ever put limitations on the government's assistance to a company like Obama has suggested, he has stated that the assistance to the firms is temporary and will go under private control as soon as possible. Furthermore, he is spurring the private enterprise through assistance to private investment firms with the acknowledgement that these firms need to get back to their private speculation... yea.. not socialist in the slightest... Your misuse of the word does nothing to the diminution of Obama's reputation, it is only a demonstration of your ignorance.

Libertymaniacs said 2/8/2010 about

Not even close? Hmmm.

You wrote: "Obama is not even close to a socialist. Go reread the tenants of socialism from a reputable source instead of relying on chain emails from rednecks."

Not even close to a socialist? One that is not even close to a socialist believes in individuals acting freely, e.g., laissez faire, free-market advocates. The nationalization of one of the largest companies in the World, along with one of the largest financial institutions, sprinkled with historically radical Keynesian fiscal and monetary measures unfortunately puts Obama closer to the "socialist camp" than we care to see.

Obama may be more of a corporativist than anything to be sure, but laissez faire he is not.

Socialism encompasses a huge number of divergent interventionist philosophies from English Fabianism, to technocratic Saint-Simonian socialism, to, of course, Marxism. It's a pretty big target to hit. Obama's views might not be identical to, say, Wilhelm Weitling or old Chucky Fourier, but they certainly are far from Ludwig von Mises.

visavismeyou said 2/8/2010 about

Wrong

Obama is not even close to a socialist. Go reread the tenants of socialism from a reputable source instead of relying on chain emails from rednecks.

EcoTees said 11/11/2009 about

Nice Bumper Sticker

brotherbock said 6/26/2009 about

You wouldn't know socialism if it bit you in the...

Quick: what are the differences between liberals, socialists, and communists? There ARE differences. BIG ones. Do you know what they are? Should I make "Gingerich is a Fascist" bumper stickers? Those would make about as much sense.

rcketscientist said 4/27/2009 about

Silly Communists

Social programs are not socialism. Your public library is socialism when the government takes 95% of citizen A's salary to pay for it because he was clever enough to innovate in the business world and god forbid be successful. The public library is socialism when it's abandoned because your economy just collapsed. Rinse and repeat with your other silly examples.

darlas555 said 4/13/2009 about

read history!!!!!

If we wanted a socialist country we could have stayed in England!! We are the home of the free because of the brave!! Capitalism works, it has surged us forward faster and more productive than any other society in history. BAR NONE Get a clue, this guy is a power hungry , beast ready to serve the US up for all of his glory. dont forget ...everything has a price.... and all this "free" stuff costs us our LIBERTIES ...one by one....

Libertymaniacs said 3/28/2009 about

Thanks for the Comments Maximum 7!

You are correct, we don't support socialism. You seem to. You can promote society organized by coercion, rationing, war, centralized bureaucratic direction, political influence over human choice, and the rejection of free cooperation. We choose to fight those things.

I take your ‘invitation’ to emigrate at face value. Or, maybe you would prefer we go to some sort of camp until we understand what’s best for us.

Sometimes it just takes a little special prodding for people to understand that the government knows best, right?

oldnicks said 3/17/2009 about

Wow...

super under educated people in our public schools...

PWT_PoorWhiteTrash said 3/2/2009 about

Stay strong in your conservative stand

http://www.zazzle.com/PWT_PoorWhiteTrash

maximus7 said 3/2/2009 about

I see that you don't like socialism. Please then do not call your police or fire department. Do not drink your tap water and do not go to your public library. Do not drive on public roads or highways because each of the preceding involves government employees. After all socialism involves government employees providing a service or product. I realize you don't want doctors working for the government but it also appears you don't like police officers, firemen, highway department people, librarians and water department employees working for the government either. Why don't you just create you own country and leave America if you don't like socialism? I didn't even mention that the military appears a socialist construct as well. Soldiers work for the government as well. I have a clue for you. Regular citizens create government so everyone of the above employees work for us.

EMangl said 10/20/2008 about