That's powerful!

that jordan guy posted a bajillion times, man. the shirt has quite nice colors and the message isn't too shaby either.

I LOVE the shirt.

I don't know any Christian that would waste their time worrying about what you don't understand.

lulz

lovin' the comments here too!

insane comment section here - nice shirt

Great shirt - I LOVE the crazy comment section as well - Kudos!

Science measures time in units that we use for the present. But in accordance to relativity, it is possible for a day 5 years ago, to seem like an experience of 5-10 days. 5 years from now, it's possible for a day that we measure as 24 hours now, will still be 24 hours, but experienced as 2. Relativity brings the quanta into physics. In terms of "religion" though, the numbers could be more of a symbolic expression, or maybe even a direct contradiction. Who cares? I think we as people/men, sons/daughters of god/goddess, whatever. Can use evolution as a form of creation, and re-evolve, evolve, or whatever. To be inclusive of reality. Not restricting. Think about it. Aliens, monkeys, and dna synthesis. We are creating/recreating, perhaps, in a subconscious way of reflecting our eternal parents way of creating us.

Science PROVES the world is older than religion allows, fact. Religion says people rose from the dead, walked on water, stoned a woman for adultery but not the man? "fact" Religion says man is obliged to god for 'creating' the world and us (humans) despite the numerous health problems we as a species have (which evolutionists attribute to us being evolved from crawling animal), and also how we've adapted to out environment (and then developed far enough from bible times, no denying that) that we can take advantage of it and are doing so. How can you still keep touting creationism?

I'm only one suggesting that there is no "superior" theism. You're the one suggesting that stereotyping and name calling are superior to examples and maps of logic. I'm saying I thought about them, i research them, i have examples of proof i can refer to because of "science"... but I don't label myself, because I don't honestly know myself. Can you relate, at all? I'm suggesting that instead of wearing label, and insisting on marking all of those who can be "identified" (contributing to the religious war), maybe it would help to approach people as people instead of letting some sort of theism stand in your head as "the truth" in between you others. It hinders your learning. Your god is anger and self-isolation. Stop cutting yoursef.... short.

"I appreciate all contribution, but I swim best in the sea of intellectual." You have to be joking. If not, I wish you well in your delusional world of superiority over those who don't conform to your brand of bullshit. I take responsibility for my actions, I don't hide behind a fake god when I make mistakes. You should try to do the same some time.

To me, religion is simply "the way a person is conscientiousness". Everyone has their own religion; being a label-whore and calling oneself anything is a point of distinguishment... and to imply permanence behind that is just stubborn. Change is apart of evolving. You either fight it, and mutate, or work with it and discover your insight. In this sense, evolution is the creative force of "God" or "no God" or whatever you call the leading element of the hierarchy of life. You believe that such a concept of free-will exists? How about self-awareness? Do you try to take responsibility for your choices, or do you just blame other people and/or things?

I'm not saying it's bad or good. It is what it is. And in terms of the definition of "religion" I refer to this definition found in the dictionary: "the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices" Believing in the non-existence of God is an assertive belief established to counter the imposing belief of "God's existence". Atheism is still apart of the "religious war", but remains more passive aggressive in general. If you look at it from a cultural point of view, "god" is just as definable as the word "love" and some say "god" is "love" while others say "love" is "god". When "god" is an unknown variable, it does take faith to assert denial. Everyone has their own perspective, and to each own, "God" and "Godlessness" is all real. To believe in the opposite of something because someone believes in something is just being antagonistic with no aim to find resolution, but to explore conflict. I appreciate all contribution, but I swim best in the sea of intellectual.

Atheism is defined as lack of belief in a god. That's it. There's nothing else to it. It's not a religion, and science is not a religion. It's cute how you guys try to equate it as such in sort of "it's just as bad!" fashion.

Atheism is a religion. =P

it doesn't justify it. science and religion both suggest that there was cause for it to happen. either somebody wants to communicate their feelings, and they feel silenced or censored... or someone is being deceiving about what happened and what is happening, or all of the above. I don't think the worlds' cultural religions support such acts. Although they have recorded such acts in their history books (like the bible), they all generally "conclude" that the war is spiritual (internal?). And if it is won, then everything else falls into place. (the external/material) To me, all religions point at exploring "mind" (or spirit) over matter, through faith in the spirit that interconnects all things. Look up "messages in water" on youtube. It's proof that "prayer" works.

If science is a religion, and religion is an ancient culture's "science", how does that justify crashing planes into buildings?

this "science" that the shirt is referring to is a religion of the age.